Humanlike AIThe model index

Side by side

HumanLike Homo 1 vs Tavus CVI

Up to 4 models, normalised onto the same cost basis and scored through the lens you pick.

HumanLike logo
HumanLike Homo 1
HumanLike
Tavus logo
Tavus CVI
Tavus
Cost of talking
Per minute$0.0050$1.00Estimate
Per hour$0.300$60.00
30-min interview$0.150$30.00
List price$0.005/minPublished$1/minEstimate
Recruitment fit
Overall88/10090/100
VerdictThe cost floor for candidate-facing video — cheap enough to leave running on every job page, not just the interview.The most complete option for conversational screening — the perception layer is worth the premium when a real person is on the other end.
Best for
Job-page avatarsCandidate FAQ and chatHigh-volume first contact
First-round conversational screeningEmployer-brand videos personalised per candidateProctored assessments where attention signals matter
Watch out for
  • No visual perception layer — it does not see the candidate the way Tavus Raven does
  • Proctoring and attention signals need a separate component
  • At roughly $1/min it is 200× the cost of Homo 1 — model your per-interview cost before committing
  • Recording a candidate’s webcam raises consent and data-retention obligations; several jurisdictions require explicit notice for automated video assessment
  • A trained replica of a real employee needs that employee’s written consent
What it animates
Coverage
FaceFullFull
Lip-syncFullFull
Upper torsoPartialPartial
HandsNoneNone
Full bodyNoneNone
Capabilities
Modalitiesavatar, videoavatar, video, speech
Context window——
VariantsReal-timePhoenix-3 (render), Raven-0 (perception), Sparrow-0 (turn-taking), Hummingbird-0 (lip-sync)
On HumanLikeHomo, AI Personas, InterviewAI Personas, Interview
HumanLike evals
Wired into HumanLike avatars—Yes — face_id providerOur eval
Published benchmarks
Lip-sync accuracy99%Our eval90%Estimate
End-to-end latency300 msOur eval1000 msEstimate

Cost per hour assumes 150 wpm and a 40% AI speaking share. Hover a figure for its full derivation.