Side by side

HeyGen Interactive Avatar vs HumanLike Homo 1

Up to 4 models, normalised onto the same cost basis and scored through the lens you pick.

	HeyGen Interactive Avatar HeyGen	HumanLike Homo 1 HumanLike
Cost of talking
Per minute	$0.500Estimate	$0.0050
Per hour	$30.00	$0.300
30-min interview	$15.00	$0.150
List price	$0.5/minEstimate	$0.005/minPublished
Recruitment fit
Overall	72/100	88/100
Verdict	Good for employer-brand content, weaker as a live interviewer than Tavus.	The cost floor for candidate-facing video — cheap enough to leave running on every job page, not just the interview.
Best for	Employer-brand videoMultilingual job adsOnboarding content	Job-page avatarsCandidate FAQ and chatHigh-volume first contact
Watch out for	1.2s latency is noticeable in live conversation Stock faces can read as generic to candidates	No visual perception layer — it does not see the candidate the way Tavus Raven does Proctoring and attention signals need a separate component
What it animates
Coverage
Face	Full	Full
Lip-sync	Full	Full
Upper torso	Full	Partial
Hands	Partial	None
Full body	Partial	None
Capabilities
Modalities	avatar, video	avatar, video
Context window	—	—
Variants	Interactive, Studio (rendered)	Real-time
On HumanLike	Not yet	Homo, AI Personas, Interview
Published benchmarks
Lip-sync accuracy	92%Estimate	99%Our eval
Utterance-to-utterance latency	1200 msEstimate	300 msOur eval

Cost per hour assumes 150 wpm and a 40% AI speaking share. Hover a figure for its full derivation.