Side by side
Up to 4 models, normalised onto the same cost basis and scored through the lens you pick.
| Cost of talking | ||
| Per minute | $0.012Estimate | $0.0083Estimate |
| Per hour | $0.698 | $0.499 |
| 30-min interview | $0.349 | $0.249 |
| List price | $1.75 / $14 per 1MEstimate | $1.25 / $10 per 1MEstimate |
| Recruitment fit | ||
| Overall | 93/100 | 86/100 |
| Verdict | The strongest general model for hiring work — but only worth its price on the judgement-heavy steps, not on parsing. | The pragmatic hiring default — Terra handles almost every screening and drafting task at a fraction of frontier cost. |
| Best for | Structured interview scoring against a rubricComparing a shortlist against a job specDrafting candidate feedback that a human will edit | CV screening at volumeCandidate Q&AInterview note summarisation |
| Watch out for |
|
|
| Capabilities | ||
| Modalities | text, audio | text, audio |
| Context window | 400K | 400K |
| Variants | Max effort, High, Medium, Low, Mini | Sol, Terra, Luna |
| On HumanLike | Not yet | Coworker, Live Chat |
| HumanLike evals | ||
| CV field extraction (F1) | 0.94Estimate | — |
| Time to first token (medium effort) | 640 msEstimate | — |
| Default Coworker chat model | — | LunaOur eval |
| Published benchmarks | ||
| MMLU-Pro | TBDEstimate | TBDEstimate |
| SWE-bench Verified | TBDEstimate | — |
Cost per hour assumes 150 wpm and a 40% AI speaking share. Hover a figure for its full derivation.