Side by side
Up to 4 models, normalised onto the same cost basis and scored through the lens you pick.
| Cost of talking | ||
| Per minute | $0.016 | $0.0083 |
| Per hour | $0.949 | $0.499 |
| 30-min interview | $0.474 | $0.249 |
| List price | $2.5 / $10 per 1MPublished | $1.25 / $10 per 1MPublished |
| Recruitment fit | ||
| Overall | 66/100 | 78/100 |
| Verdict | Only worth choosing today for its realtime voice variant; the text tiers are outclassed. | Still capable for screening work, but 5.6 does the same job cheaper and faster. |
| Best for | Live voice screening where latency dominates | Existing pipelines already pinned to GPT-5 |
| Watch out for |
|
|
| Capabilities | ||
| Modalities | text, audio | text |
| Context window | 128K | 400K |
| Variants | Standard, Mini, Realtime | Standard, Mini, Nano |
| On HumanLike | Not yet | Not yet |
| Published benchmarks | ||
| MMLU | 88.7%Published | — |
Cost per hour assumes 150 wpm and a 40% AI speaking share. Hover a figure for its full derivation.