Side by side
Spatius vs HumanLike Homo 1
Any number of models of one kind, normalised onto the same cost basis and scored through the lens you pick.
| How it looks | ||
| Cost of talking | ||
| Per minute | $0.0072 | $0.0050 |
| Per hour | $0.432 | $0.300 |
| 30-min interview | $0.216 | $0.150 |
| List price | $0.0072/minPublished | $0.005/minPublished |
| Recruitment fit | ||
| Overall | 80/100 | 88/100 |
| Verdict | A very cheap, good-looking avatar that runs in the browser, without a visual perception layer. | The cost floor for candidate-facing video, cheap enough to leave running on every job page, not just the interview. |
| Best for | Browser-based interviewsAlways-on job page avatars | Job-page avatarsCandidate FAQ and chatHigh-volume first contact |
| Watch out for |
|
|
| What it animates | ||
| Coverage | ||
| Face | Full | Full |
| Lip-sync | Full | Full |
| Upper torso | Partial | Partial |
| Hands | None | None |
| Full body | None | None |
| Prompt artifacts | None | None |
| Capabilities | ||
| Modalities | avatar | avatar, video |
| Context window | n/a | n/a |
| Variants | Real-time | Real-time |
| On HumanLike | Interview | Homo, AI Personas, Interview |
| Published benchmarks | ||
| Lip-sync accuracy | n/a | 99%Our eval |
| End-to-end latency | n/a | 300 msOur eval |
Cost per hour assumes 150 wpm and a 40% AI speaking share. Hover a figure for its full derivation.