All tools

Compare AI models

Cost and benchmarks side by side

Tavus CVI vs HumanLike Homo 1

Cost of talking
Per minute$1.00Estimate$0.0050
Per hour$60.00$0.300
30 min interview$30.00$0.150
List price$1/minEstimate$0.005/minPublished
Recruitment fit
Overall
90/100
88/100
VerdictThe most complete option for conversational screening, the perception layer is worth the premium when a real person is on the other end.The cost floor for candidate-facing video, cheap enough to leave running on every job page, not just the interview.
Best for
First-round conversational screeningEmployer-brand videos personalised per candidateProctored assessments
Job-page avatarsCandidate FAQ and chatHigh-volume first contact
Watch out for
  • 200× the cost of Homo 1
  • Webcam consent and retention duties
  • Replicas need written consent
  • No visual perception layer
  • Proctoring needs a separate component
What it animates
Coverage
FaceFullFull
Lip-syncFullFull
Upper torsoPartialPartial
HandsNoneNone
Full bodyNoneNone
Prompt artifactsNoneNone
Capabilities
Modalitiesavatar, video, speechavatar, video
Context windown/an/a
VariantsPhoenix-4.5, Phoenix-4, Phoenix-3 (legacy)Real-time, PRO (rendered)
On HumanlikeNot yetHomo, AI Personas, Interview
Published benchmarks
Lip-sync accuracy
90%Estimate
99%Our eval
Utterance-to-utterance latency
1000 msEstimate
300 msOur eval

Cost per hour assumes 150 words a minute and a 40% AI speaking share. Hover a figure for how it was derived.