All tools

Compare AI models

Cost and benchmarks side by side

HumanLike Homo 1 vs Tavus CVI

Cost of talking
Per minute$0.0050$1.00Estimate
Per hour$0.300$60.00
30 min interview$0.150$30.00
List price$0.005/minPublished$1/minEstimate
Recruitment fit
Overall
88/100
90/100
VerdictThe cost floor for candidate-facing video, cheap enough to leave running on every job page, not just the interview.The most complete option for conversational screening, the perception layer is worth the premium when a real person is on the other end.
Best for
Job-page avatarsCandidate FAQ and chatHigh-volume first contact
First-round conversational screeningEmployer-brand videos personalised per candidateProctored assessments
Watch out for
  • No visual perception layer
  • Proctoring needs a separate component
  • 200× the cost of Homo 1
  • Webcam consent and retention duties
  • Replicas need written consent
What it animates
Coverage
FaceFullFull
Lip-syncFullFull
Upper torsoPartialPartial
HandsNoneNone
Full bodyNoneNone
Prompt artifactsNoneNone
Capabilities
Modalitiesavatar, videoavatar, video, speech
Context windown/an/a
VariantsReal-time, PRO (rendered)Phoenix-4.5, Phoenix-4, Phoenix-3 (legacy)
On HumanlikeHomo, AI Personas, InterviewNot yet
Published benchmarks
Lip-sync accuracy
99%Our eval
90%Estimate
End-to-end latency
300 msOur eval
1000 msEstimate

Cost per hour assumes 150 words a minute and a 40% AI speaking share. Hover a figure for how it was derived.