Compare AI models
Cost and benchmarks side by side
HumanLike Homo 1 vs HeyGen Interactive Avatar
| Cost of talking | ||
| Per minute | $0.0050 | $0.500Estimate |
| Per hour | $0.300 | $30.00 |
| 30 min interview | $0.150 | $15.00 |
| List price | $0.005/minPublished | $0.5/minEstimate |
| Recruitment fit | ||
| Overall | 88/100 | 72/100 |
| Verdict | The cost floor for candidate-facing video, cheap enough to leave running on every job page, not just the interview. | Good for employer-brand content, weaker as a live interviewer than Tavus. |
| Best for | Job-page avatarsCandidate FAQ and chatHigh-volume first contact | Employer-brand videoMultilingual job adsOnboarding content |
| Watch out for |
|
|
| What it animates | ||
| Coverage | ||
| Face | Full | Full |
| Lip-sync | Full | Full |
| Upper torso | Partial | Full |
| Hands | None | Partial |
| Full body | None | Partial |
| Prompt artifacts | None | None |
| Capabilities | ||
| Modalities | avatar, video | avatar, video |
| Context window | n/a | n/a |
| Variants | Real-time, PRO (rendered) | Interactive, Studio (rendered) |
| On Humanlike | Homo, AI Personas, Interview | Not yet |
| Published benchmarks | ||
| Lip-sync accuracy | 99%Our eval | 92%Estimate |
| End-to-end latency | 300 msOur eval | 1200 msEstimate |
Cost per hour assumes 150 words a minute and a 40% AI speaking share. Hover a figure for how it was derived.