Compare AI models
Cost and benchmarks side by side
HeyGen Interactive Avatar vs HumanLike Homo 1
| Cost of talking | ||
| Per minute | $0.500Estimate | $0.0050 |
| Per hour | $30.00 | $0.300 |
| 30 min interview | $15.00 | $0.150 |
| List price | $0.5/minEstimate | $0.005/minPublished |
| Recruitment fit | ||
| Overall | 72/100 | 88/100 |
| Verdict | Good for employer-brand content, weaker as a live interviewer than Tavus. | The cost floor for candidate-facing video, cheap enough to leave running on every job page, not just the interview. |
| Best for | Employer-brand videoMultilingual job adsOnboarding content | Job-page avatarsCandidate FAQ and chatHigh-volume first contact |
| Watch out for |
|
|
| What it animates | ||
| Coverage | ||
| Face | Full | Full |
| Lip-sync | Full | Full |
| Upper torso | Full | Partial |
| Hands | Partial | None |
| Full body | Partial | None |
| Prompt artifacts | None | None |
| Capabilities | ||
| Modalities | avatar, video | avatar, video |
| Context window | n/a | n/a |
| Variants | Interactive, Studio (rendered) | Real-time, PRO (rendered) |
| On Humanlike | Not yet | Homo, AI Personas, Interview |
| Published benchmarks | ||
| Lip-sync accuracy | 92%Estimate | 99%Our eval |
| Utterance-to-utterance latency | 1200 msEstimate | 300 msOur eval |
Cost per hour assumes 150 words a minute and a 40% AI speaking share. Hover a figure for how it was derived.